The issue of industry support for professional education in medicine is as relevant today as it was last year – if not more so. So, CEJA is again drafting a report for this year’s AMA’s House of Delegates Annual Meeting. The good news is it looks like CEJA listened to the complaints! CEJA, along with the AMA’s Council on Medical Education, reached out to the CME community early in the process by inviting key stakeholders to a facilitated discussion in late February. Kudos go to Regina M. Benjamin, MD, MBA and Claudette C. Dalton, MD, chairs respectively of CEJA and the Council on Medical Education, for making sure that, this year, stakeholders had time to consider the issues and provide input.
Invited stakeholders included the ACCME, the Alliance for CME, AAMSE, CMSS, PHARMa, and various medical societies, among others. Each organization’s representative was asked to share responses to the following questions:
- When is conflicted expertise essential in CME? How can we tell when it is no longer needed?
- What unique challenges do you as a stakeholder face regarding CME?
- How can we ensure that medicine sets the agenda for CME overall so that it meets the needs of patients and physicians rather than the interest of commercial support?
And check back later, when Shelly Rodrigues, AAMSE’s representative to this meeting and chair of the Medical Education Leadership Forum will share AAMSE’s response and her meeting take-aways.










No comments:
Post a Comment